Golden Lion Tamarin (Leontopithecus rosalia)

From Wikipedia

Open on Wikipedia

Golden lion tamarin[1][2]
Male at Copenhagen Zoo, Copenhagen, Denmark
Female at the Bronx Zoo, New York, United States
CITES Appendix I
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Primates
Family: Callitrichidae
Genus: Leontopithecus
Species:
L. rosalia
Binomial name
Leontopithecus rosalia
Synonyms
  • Jacchus rosalia brasiliensis Fischer, 1829
  • Jacchus rosalia guyannensis Fischer, 1829
  • Leontocebus leoninus Pocock, 1914
  • Leontopithecus aurora Elliot, 1913
  • Leontopithecus marikina Lesson, 1840
  • Simia rosalia Linnaeus, 1766

The golden lion tamarin (Leontopithecus rosalia; Portuguese: mico-leão-dourado [ˈmiku leˈɐ̃w do(w)ˈɾadu, - liˈɐ̃w -]), less commonly known as the golden lion marmoset, is a small New World monkey of the family Callitrichidae. Endemic to the Atlantic coastal forests of Brazil, the golden lion tamarin is an endangered species. The geographic range is entirely within the state of Rio de Janeiro. A 2022/2023 census estimated about 4,800 individuals living in the current primary area of occurrence in the non-coastal area of the São João and Macaé river basins,[5] with unknown but smaller additional numbers in limited coastal forests[6] and to the west of the primary area of occurrence.[7][8] There is a captive population maintaining about 490 individuals among 150 zoos.[3]

Physical characteristic

[edit]
Closeup on the golden lion tamarin's face

The golden lion tamarin gets its name from its bright reddish orange pelage and the extra-long hairs around the face and ears which give it a distinctive mane.[9] Its face is dark and hairless. The bright orange fur of this species does not contain carotenoids, which commonly produce bright orange colors in nature.[10] The golden lion tamarin is the largest of the callitrichid monkeys. It is typically around 261 mm (10.3 in) and weighs around 620 g (1.37 lb). There is almost no size difference between males and females. As with all callitrichids, the golden lion tamarin has claw-like nails, instead of the flat nails found in other monkeys and apes, although callitrichids do have a flat nail on the big toe.[11] Golden lion tamarins walk, run, and bound quadrupedally on top of branches, or, less frequently, they run and walk on the ground.[12][13] When golden lion tamarins run or bound, their hindlimbs alternately overstride their forelimbs, and their feet are set atop the support and grasp it almost perpendicular to the line of travel, making the body's angle of travel oblique rather than precisely parallel to the substrate, a pattern known as “transaxial bounding”.[12][13] In addition, facilitated by their claw-like nails, golden lion tamarins cling and climb on vertical tree trunks (see photographs in:[14] pp 108–117, 137, 155).

Habitat and distribution

[edit]

The golden lion tamarin has a limited current area of occupancy, as most of the original habitat in the Brazilian state of Rio de Janeiro has been lost to deforestation.[6] Today, the species is confined to fragments of forest within the state, including Poço das Antas Biological Reserve, União Biological Reserve, other protected areas, and privately owned lands. Most of the area of occupancy is characterized by vegetation types classified as dense broadleaf evergreen or seasonal deciduous and semi-deciduous forest,[15] with some tamarins living in areas closest to the coast found in a sandy soil forest type called "arboreal restinga".[16] Golden lion tamarins are thought to occur primarily in low elevation forests, up to 150[17] or 300[18] meters above sea level, but a 1990–1992 survey identified two groups above 500 meters,[19] and reports from the recently identified western geographic area include records above 700 meters.[8][20]

Golden lion tamarin population estimates in the 1960s and 1970s ranged from only 100 to 600,[21][22] although these estimates were not based on range-wide censuses. The first such census, carried out 1990–1992, counted about 560 wild individuals[23][19] and there were about 100 additional individuals from the reintroduction program living in the wild.[19] Since then, following conservation efforts including reintroduction of zoo-born animals[24][25] and translocation of wild individuals from small, at-risk forest fragments[25] (both largely to areas then unoccupied by tamarins), reforestation with a particular focus on connecting separated areas of habitat,[26][27] and community-based conservation and engagement programs,[28][29] the population has grown significantly. Most recently, a 2022/2023 census estimated about 4,800 golden lion tamarins living in the current primary area of occurrence in the non-coastal area of the São João and Macaé river basins,[5] with unknown but smaller additional numbers in limited coastal forests[6] and to the west of the primary area of occurrence.[7][8]

Behaviour and ecology

[edit]
Leontopithecus rosalia in Singapore Zoo

Diet

[edit]

In the wild, golden lion tamarins eat mostly fruits and small animal prey, in addition to smaller quantities of nectar and plant exudates (tree gum) (see[30] for summary).

Plant Material

[edit]

Fruits, mostly ripe,[30] are the plant part consumed by golden lion tamarins for more than 80% of plant species eaten.[31][32] Tamarins swallow the seeds of most fruits they consume and are considered to function as effective seed dispersers for many plant species.[33][34][35]

Wild golden lion tamarins eat from a wide variety of plant species, with 160 species noted in one multi-group study.[33] Despite this variety of food plants, golden lion tamarins appear to get most of their plant food from a smaller subset of species.[30][31][32][33] For example, just seven of the 160 plant species noted eaten by golden lion tamarins in the União Biological Reserve accounted for 56% of total plant feeding observations.[30]

The most common reported source of nectar in golden lion tamarin diets are the flowers of the tree Symphonia globulifera.[30][31][33] Nectar consumption typically represents a small proportion of the golden lion tamarin plant diet (6%-10% of observations or time[30][32]). However, some golden lion tamarin groups may concentrate heavily on nectar during the cool, dry season in at least some years.[30][31][33]

Exudates or tree gum are soft, semi-liquid substances produced by trees and lianas in response to damage to exterior bark or to disease, or within seed pods. Golden lion tamarins in the Poço das Antas Reserve fed occasionally on tree gum that they found opportunistically on trees and woody lianas,[36] and gum consumption represented less than 2% of total feeding observations or time.[30][31][32] Lion tamarins (and other tamarins) lack the dentition and other specializations for gum-feeding characteristic of marmoset genera, e.g., Callithrix and Cebuella.[37][38][39][40][41]

Animal Prey

[edit]

Animal prey reported as eaten by wild golden lion tamarins in at least one study include frogs and tree frogs, amphibian egg masses, lizards, snakes, nestling birds, bird eggs, snails, spiders, centipedes, katydids, grasshoppers, crickets, beetles and beetle larvae, cockroaches, ants, stick insects, butterflies, caterpillars, and insect-infested tree galls.[30][31][32][33][42] Orthopteran insects (e.g., grasshoppers, katydids, and crickets) were the most commonly eaten prey in one study.[32]

Golden lion tamarins capture most of their prey animals from hidden crevices in tree bark, rotten wood, holes in trees, vine tangles, within curled dead leaves, between the leaves and in the basins of bromeliads, inside hollow bamboo, under the sheaths of palm leaves, or in leaf litter on the ground and debris accumulated in limb junctures and palm apices. A golden lion tamarin captures such hidden prey by inserting its fingers, hand, and even forearm into the visually inaccessible recesses, groping blindly by sense of touch, grasping an encountered prey item, and withdrawing and eating it.[41] This is a form of the foraging technique known as "extractive foraging on embedded foods",[43] and in golden lion tamarins has been termed "micro-manipulation".[32][44][45] Peres[46] reported that such extractive foraging accounted for 98% of prey captures observed in one study in the Poço das Antas Biological Reserve. Lion tamarins (the genus Leontopithecus as a whole) have significantly longer and narrower hands (including longer fingers) than other callitrichids. This is considered to be an adaptation to their micro-manipulation foraging behavior for embedded prey.[47]

Home range and use of space

[edit]

Golden lion tamarin groups are highly territorial. They have areas of exclusive use, but engage in aggressive encounters with neighboring groups at borders and in areas of overlap.[30][32][46] These encounters feature chases and characteristic vocalizations and posturing, and can include brief physical contact and fights.[46] Peres[46] proposed that these encounters served to reinforce boundaries and preserve areas of exclusive use, "preventing neighbors from trespassing farther" (p 232).  The term "home range" is used here, representing the full area that a tamarin group uses, including both areas of exclusive use and areas of overlap with neighboring groups. For one study group in Poço das Antas Biological Reserve, about 60% of the study group's home range was overlapped by the home ranges of neighboring groups.[46]

A long-term study in Poço das Antas Biological Reserve calculated a mean home range size of 50.5 ha (124.8 acres) for golden lion tamarin groups over one-year periods[48](pp 66–67), with a range of 17.4-87.7 ha (43.0-216.7 acres).[49] Reports from União Biological Reserve indicate larger home range sizes there,[30][33][50] which may be a result of lower population density in União at the time of the studies,[30][33] as well as differences in calculation methods.[48] Golden lion tamarin home ranges are not static over time.[46][48] One study found a mean of 77% home range overlap for a group between one year and the next.[48]

Wild golden lion tamarins use their home ranges unevenly, with some areas used much more heavily than others.[30][31][46][48] In a study in Poço das Antas Biological Reserve, "core areas", where 50% of a group's location records were documented, averaged approximately 10% of a group's total home range.[48]

Reports of average daily travel distances for individual groups of golden lion tamarins range from 1,339 to 2,135 m (4,393 to 7,005 feet).[30][31][33][48][50] Single-day travel distances for groups vary more widely. For example, in one study of two groups in União Biological Reserve, single day travel distances ranged from 401 to 3,916 m (1,316 to 12,848 feet).[30]

Sleeping sites

[edit]

Golden lion tamarins usually spend more than half their time in overnight sleeping sites, and thus are active for less than half the day. Two groups in the União Biological Reserve spent an average of 14.2 hours and 13.1 hours in their sleeping sites[50] (calculated from Table 1). Active periods are longer in the austral summer, when there are more hours of daylight. In the Poço das Antas Biological Reserve, golden lion tamarins left their sleeping sites in the morning an average of 10 min after sunrise and entered at the end of the day an average of 82 min before sunset.[51]

Multiple authors have reported that golden lion tamarins prefer to sleep in naturally-occurring tree holes.[31][50][51][52][53] Tree holes, also termed tree cavities or tree hollows, are reported as the predominant sleeping site for other lion tamarin species as well (summary in[30]). In an extensive study of golden lion tamarins in the Poço das Antas Biological Reserve, tree holes were the most commonly used type of site (63.6% of “nights”), followed by (non-native) bamboo clusters at ground level (17.5%), vine tangles in trees (9.6%), and large bromeliads growing on trees (4.7%).[51] Golden lion tamarin groups in the União Biological Reserve used tree holes exclusively or almost exclusively.[50][53] This heavy use of tree holes is in contrast to other callitrichid genera, which have been reported to use tree holes, but typically not predominantly, or to not use tree holes at all (see, for example, brief review in.[54]

Golden lion tamarin groups use multiple sleeping sites across time.[51][53][55] Some groups in the Poço das Antas Biological Reserve used more than 40 sites across multiple years of study.[55] Groups use a small subset of these sites frequently, suggesting that some sites are highly preferred over others.[51][53] In the Poço das Antas Biological Reserve, golden lion tamarin groups used the same sleeping site on consecutive nights in approximately 50% of the cases when sites for consecutive nights were identified.[51] Two groups in the União Biological Reserve used the same site on consecutive nights at somewhat lower rates, 20% and 38%.[50][53]

Multiple authors, for example,[51][52][55] have discussed the role of sleeping site selection in relation to (overnight) predation, proposing that tree holes may provide greater protection from predators than other sleeping site types.

Predators

[edit]

There are only a few published reports confirming identities of successful predators on golden lion tamarins, with these cases including a boa constrictor (Boa constrictor),[30]: 158  a small cat identified as an ocelot (Felis pardalis),[56] and a feral dog (Canis familiaris),[56] the latter two incidents involving reintroduced zoo-born golden lion tamarins. However, circumstantial evidence suggests that additional species are golden lion tamarin predators as well: raptors;[57] capuchin monkeys (Cebus/Sapajus nigritus);[57][55] coatimundis (Nasua nasua);[55] and tayra (Eira barbara).[55][58]

Tayra were strongly suspected as the primary predator in a series of deaths and disappearances in Poço das Antas Biological Reserve.[55] From 1995 to 2000, a sharp increase in predation was noted in the golden lion tamarin study population in the reserve, substantially reducing the estimated reserve population from 350 to 220 individuals during this period.[55] At least during this period, most documented predation appeared to have occurred overnight, at or in proximity to sleeping sites.[55] Multiple authors have discussed the role of sleeping site selection in relation to (overnight) predation, noting that tree holes, a den type frequently used by golden lion tamarins, may provide greater protection from predators than other sleeping site types,[55][59][60] although most of the documented events at the Poço das Antas reserve occurred at such tree hole sleeping sites.

Wild golden lion tamarins approach and mob some arboreal and terrestrial predators, e.g., snakes and tayra, as well as perched raptors,[57] but are reported to retreat quietly from capuchin monkeys[57] p 240. Golden lion tamarins also use alarm vocalizations in reaction to predators. Calls associated with terrestrial/arboreal predators are reported to differ from those associated with flying predators in both captive situations[61][62][63] and the wild.[57]

Social structure

[edit]
Family groups may consist of up to eight members.

Golden lion tamarins are social and groups typically consist of 2-8 members. These groups usually consist of one breeding adult male and female but may also have 2–3 males and one female or the reverse.[64] Other members include subadults, juveniles and infants of either sex. These individuals are typically the offspring of the adults. When there is more than one breeding adult in a group, one is usually dominant over the other and this is maintained through aggressive behavior. The dominance relationship between males and females depends on longevity in the group. A newly immigrated male is subordinate to the resident adult female who inherited her rank from her mother.[65] Both males and females may leave their natal group at the age of four, however females may replace their mothers as the breeding adult, if they die, which will lead to the dispersal of the breeding male who is likely her father. This does not happen with males and their fathers. Dispersing males join groups with other males and remain in them until they find an opportunity to immigrate to a new group. The vast majority of recruits to groups are males.[66] A male may find an opportunity to enter into a group when the resident male dies or disappears. Males may also aggressively displace resident males from their group; this is usually done by two immigrant males who are likely brothers. When this happens, only one of the new males will be able to breed and will suppress the reproduction of the other. A resident male may also leave a vacancy when his daughter becomes the breeding female and he must disperse to avoid inbreeding.[67]

Communication

[edit]

Like other callitrichids, golden lion tamarins use auditory, olfactory, and visual signals to communicate within and between groups.

Vocal Communication

[edit]

Because the dense structure of their rainforest habitat limits opportunity for visual signaling, golden lion tamarins rely mostly on sound for real-time communication about group movement, availability of food, predator presence, and inter-group spacing,[57] and they vocalize at a high rate during daily group activities. The most extensive published study on within-group vocal behavior in wild golden lion tamarins[68] reported that adults emitted an average of 2.1 vocalizations/minute.

Ruiz-Miranda and Kleiman[57] identified a repertoire of 15 to 21 vocalizations, grouped into six categories defined by acoustic similarities: tonal, atonal, clucks, trills, multisyllable calls, and combination calls. Note that other published reports[68][69][70] have each used different names and grouping systems for golden lion tamarin calls.

Most golden lion tamarin vocalizations appear to provide information about the caller: identity;[57][71] location;[68] activity;[68] and perhaps intent.[68] However, some vocalizations appear to provide information external to the caller,[57] including alarm calls to the presence of a predator.[57][63] Boinski and co-authors[68] reported that different within-group call types tended to each be associated with specific behavioral or spatial contexts and thus provided accurate, “honest” information about the caller to the rest of the group.

“Long calls” are loud, relatively long vocalizations used by golden lion tamarins both for within-group communication and for between-group communication related to inter-group spacing, including during territorial encounters between neighboring groups.[57][69][72]

Young golden lion tamarins are also highly vocal, and may call at up to three times the rate of adults.[57] Up to nine months of age, young golden lion tamarins mostly use loud rasps (one of the “atonal” vocalizations), medium or long trills, or combinations of rasps and trills.[57] Early, before two months of age, these vocalizations are given by an infant thought to be signaling to be nursed or picked up by an adult.[57] As immature golden lion tamarins begin eating solid food, these rasps and trills are used persistently while begging for food from other group members.[73]

Olfactory Communication

[edit]

Like other marmosets and tamarins,[74] golden lion tamarins scent-mark using multiple glandular regions. Research on other callitrichids indicates that scent marks allow receivers to differentiate individuals and determine sex, dominance status, and female reproductive status,[74][75] and this may be true for golden lion tamarins as well.

Studies on scent-marking in zoo and wild golden lion tamarins have led researchers to propose  specific within- and between-group communication functions that may vary by sex and dominance status, and that scent may serve as a marker for important ecological resources.[76][77][78] However, challenges in ascribing or excluding particular functions for scent-marking in callitrichids have been noted in studies on other callitrichid species, including conflicting interpretations of scent-marking data from wild moustached tamarins (Saguinus mystax) (compare [79] with [80]) and saddleback tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis) (compare [81] and [82] with [83]). Further, a summary largely focused on cottontop tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) and common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus)[84] demonstrates the complex relationship between social context and chemical communication in callitrichids.

Visual Communication

[edit]

A small array of visual signals has been described for golden lion tamarins.[70] The most striking of the visual signals are the arch displays. Similar displays have been described for many New World monkeys, including  callitrichid and non-callitrichid species.[85]  The arch walk, the highest intensity of the golden lion tamarins arch displays, is characterized by erected fur, lowered head, forward-directed gaze, strongly arched back, rigid limbs and tail held down and pressed forward[85](p 130). The arch-walking individual typically walks away from the apparent target of the signal.[85] It has been noted that the arch display “makes the animal look larger and more conspicuous”[57](p 251). The within-group functional significance of this striking but infrequent behavior is not entirely clear; see [57](p 252),[86] and particularly [85] for discussion of this behavior’s context and potential meanings.

Other visual signals reported from zoo environments are summarized in[70] and additional behaviors from both zoos and the wild are reported elsewhere (Oliveira et al. 2003).[87][88][89][90]

Reproduction

[edit]
The mother provides transportation at the early stages of the infant's life.

The mating system of the golden lion tamarin is largely monogamous. When there are two adult males in a group only one of them will mate with the female. There are cases of a male mating with two females, usually a mother and daughter.[64] Reproduction is seasonal and depends on rainfall. Mating is at its highest at the end of the rainy season between late March to mid-June and births peak during the September–February rains.[91] Females are sexually mature between the ages of 15–20 months but it is not until they are 30 months old that they can reproduce.[70] Only dominant females can reproduce and will suppress the reproduction of the other females in the group.[92] Males may reach puberty by 28 months.[91] Tamarins have a four-month gestation period. Golden lion tamarin groups exhibit cooperative rearing of the infants. This is due to the fact that tamarins commonly give birth to twins and, to a lesser extent, triplets and quadruplets. By way of example, 78% of recorded births in 2001 in the Poço das Antas Reserve consisted of twins.[93] A mother is not able to provide for her litter and needs the help of the other members of the group.[94] The younger members of the groups may lose breeding opportunities but they gain parental experience in helping to rear their younger siblings.[65] In their first 4 weeks, the infants are completely dependent on their mother for nursing and carrying. By week five, the infants spend less time on their mother's back and begin to explore their surroundings. Young reach their juvenile stage at 17 weeks and will socialize with other group members. The sub-adult phase is reached at 14 months, when a tamarin first displays adult behaviors.

Conservation

[edit]
Aerial view of Poço das Antas Biological Reserve.

The geographic range of and available habitat for golden lion tamarins have both shrunk drastically in the five centuries since the arrival of Portuguese explorers in Brazil in 1500.  However, there are no estimates of the size of the population pre-1500, and the first published estimates did not appear until the 1970s. By then, golden lion tamarin population estimates ranged from only 100 to 600 surviving individuals,[21][22] although these estimates were not based on range-wide censuses. The first such census, carried out in 1990-1992, counted approximately 560 wild individuals[19][23] and there were about 100 additional individuals from the reintroduction program living in the wild.[19] Since then, the population has grown significantly, following conservation efforts that include reintroduction of zoo-born animals[24][25] and rescue and translocation of wild individuals from small, at-risk forest fragments[25] (both largely to areas then unoccupied by tamarins), reforestation with a particular focus on connecting separated areas of habitat,[26][27] and community-based conservation and engagement programs.[28][29] Most recently, a 2022/2023 census estimated more than 4,800 golden lion tamarins living in the current primary area of occurrence in the non-coastal area of the São João and Macaé river basins,[5] with unknown but smaller additional numbers in limited coastal forests[6] and to the west of the primary area of occurrence.[7][8]

The Associação Mico-Leão-Dourado (Golden Lion Tamarin Association) is a Brazilian not-for-profit focused on conservation of golden lion tamarins in the primary area of occurrence (the non-coastal area of the São João and Macaé river basins). The Association has identified a number of ongoing threats to continued recovery of the species.[26][27][95][3] Key threats include: habitat loss and fragmentation; hunting and trapping for the pet trade (see[96] for recent incidents); the recently highlighted threat of a yellow fever or other disease epidemic[97] and the potential impact of non-native species, most notably the introduced marmoset species that are now found in many of the forest areas occupied by golden lion tamarins,[98][99][100] and a feral population of introduced golden-headed lion tamarins (Leontopithecus chrysomelas) within 50 km of the geographic range of the golden lion tamarin, presenting a threat of hybridization (most of the golden-headed lion tamarins were removed between 2015 and 2018[101][102]).

Although not specifically identified in Association publications, climate change may also present a threat to long-term survival for golden lion tamarins. Meyer and co-authors[103] used climate change modeling to estimate how much of the historic geographic ranges of the four lion tamarin (Leontopithecus) species would be suitable for their survival in 2050 and 2080. They concluded that the amount of climatically suitable habitat for golden lion tamarins would be severely reduced by 2050 and insufficient for population survival by 2080. The authors stressed caution in interpreting and acting on this conclusion because of numerous uncertainties in the modeling process.

Key events in the conservation of golden lion tamarins outlined below describe past and ongoing efforts to address many of these threats.

1970's: Following their field studies, which indicate a small, declining wild population of golden lion tamarins, Adelmar Coimbra-Filho and Alceo Magnanini champion efforts that result in the 1974 creation of the federal Poço das Antas Biological Reserve.[22][104][105] In 1980, there were an estimated 75 to 150 golden lion tamarins living within the reserve.[106]

1983: The Golden Lion Tamarin Conservation Program begins activities in Brazil, launching the first systematic field studies of behavioral ecology of golden lion tamarins in the Poço das Antas Biological Reserve, later expanding to the União Biological Reserve and reintroduction sites, and initiating a community-based environmental education program in the area surrounding Poço das Antas.[23][29][61][107][108] The program's successor, the Associação Mico-Leão-Dourado (Golden Lion Tamarin Association), a Brazilian not-for-profit, was launched in 1992 and is active today.

1984: The first zoo-born tamarins are reintroduced into the wild.[24][101][61] Reintroductions, totaling 146 zoo-born golden lion tamarins, continue between 1984 and 2000. Additional details appear in a separate section below.

1994 (through 1997): Forty-three wild tamarins are rescued from small, at-risk forest fragments and translocated to the site of the future União Biological Reserve.[25][109] Additional details appear in a separate section below.

1997: Reforestation efforts are begun by the Associação Mico-Leão-Dourado, with a focus on creating forested corridors to connect separated forest fragments,[110] and thus connect separated subpopulations of golden lion tamarins. By 2022, the Association had planted a total of 4.4 km2 (1.7 sq mi) with native forest trees, in Poço das Antas Biological Reserve and on 15 private farms with tamarins.[26][27]

1998: A second federal protected area for golden lion tamarins, the União Biological Reserve, is created.[25][105] This area had been the release site for tamarins translocated from smaller forest fragments in 1994-1997.

2003: Golden lion tamarin conservation status improves from Critically Endangered to Endangered in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.[3]

2007-2024: The Associação Mico-Leão-Dourado acquires several privately held properties.[111][112][113][114] Each provides opportunities for reforestation to establish critical forest connections between separated golden lion tamarin subpopulations.

2016: The Associação Mico-Leão-Dourado adopts an overall 2025 goal of 2,000 wild golden lion tamarins living in 25,000 ha (61,766 acres; 250 km2, 97 miles2) of connected and protected habitat, which computer modeling suggests would achieve 100% probability of species survival for the next 100 years, with retention of 98% of (then current) genetic diversity during that period.[95]

2016-2019: An outbreak of yellow fever causes extensive mortality among golden lion tamarins, killing approximately 30% of the wild population, including most or all of the tamarins in the Poço das Antas Biological Reserve.[97] The Brazilian primatological and public health communities recognize yellow fever as an existential threat to nonhuman primate populations, and develop a dosage of surplus human yellow fever vaccine appropriate for smaller body size animals.[115] After the Rio de Janeiro Primate Center tests the vaccine's efficacy and safety on lion tamarins housed there,[115] Associação Mico-Leão-Dourado biologists begin vaccinating wild tamarins in 2021, apparently the first such program for wild individuals of an endangered primate.[116] As of the end of 2024, 489 individuals had been vaccinated.[114]

2020: Wildlife passageways across the recently widened highway BR-101 are completed, including one land bridge (in process of being forested) and ten canopy overpasses.[26][117] BR-101 runs adjacent to a portion of Poço das Antas Biological Reserve and between the two sections of União Biological Reserve, as well as separating Poço das Antas and one section of União from relatively large tamarin subpopulations on the northern side of the highway. The company that designed and constructed the highway expansion was legally required to fund these mitigating actions to maintain and expand fragment connectivity and reduce traffic-related wildlife deaths on this busy[118] highway. Tamarins were already using two of the canopy overpasses by late 2021.[117]

2022/2023: The fourth census of wild golden lion tamarins shows an estimated population of more than 4,800 in the species' primary area of occurrence, indicating rapid recovery from the yellow fever epidemic.[5]

Reintroduction

[edit]

In the early 1980's, the Smithsonian National Zoological Park and the Rio de Janeiro Primate Center initiated a program to reintroduce captive-born golden lion tamarins to bolster the existing wild population, thought to be no more than 600 individuals at the time.[21][22] From 1984 to 2000, as part of the Golden Lion Tamarin Conservation Program (and later the Associação Mico Leão Dourado), 146 captive-born and seven confiscated wild-born golden lion tamarins were released into the wild. Seventeen of these were released in the Poço das Antas Biological Reserve , early in the program, and the remainder on 20 privately owned ranches and farms in the species' historic area of occurrence (Kleiman et al. 1986, 1990, 1991.[5][24][25][101][109][119][61][120][121] The animals had been born at or lived in 43 different zoos and research centers in Brazil, Europe, and the United States. None of the release sites, including the specific release sites in Poço das Antas, was thought to have wild golden lion tamarins at the time of the reintroductions.

The reintroduced captive-born golden lion tamarins all had pre-release veterinary examinations. Those from Europe or the United States were quarantined for 30 days, either at one of several designated zoo quarantine facilities before shipment or at the Rio de Janeiro Primate Center after arrival in Brazil. All of the captive-born individuals were acclimated for at least 24 hours in outdoor cages at the reintroduction sites before their release.[24] The animals were monitored on five or six days per week for at least three months after being released. Most were given supplementary food and artificial shelter boxes for at least several months, and were captured and returned to the release site if they got lost.[24] This intensive post-release support improved early survival rate, although efforts to train tamarins in survival-critical skills pre-release did not appear to affect post-release survival.[24]

Over time, some of the reintroduced golden lion tamarins and/or their offspring were translocated to eight other privately owned locations[29] and recovery of forests on private lands has also allowed the tamarins to expand on their own to additional ranches and farms. As of 2022, 22 of the farms and ranches with golden lion tamarins were official private nature reserves.[27] At the time of the most recent census, in 2022/2023, there were estimated to be 2,256 surviving descendants of reintroduced golden lion tamarins, representing almost half (46%) of the total estimated population in the species' primary area of occurrence, in the non-coastal area of the São João and Macaé river basins in the Brazilian state of Rio de Janeiro (calculated from,[5] Supplementary Material).

Golden lion tamarin on the Brazilian Real R$20 banknote.

Translocation

[edit]

During a 1990-1992 survey, a number of golden lion tamarin groups were identified in very small and/or immediately imperiled forest fragments in the Rio de Janeiro State municipalities of Cabo Frio, Búzios, Saquarema, and Araruama.[19] Between 1994 and 1997, under the administration of the Associação Mico-Leão-Dourado (Golden Lion Tamarin Association), 43 individuals from some of these forest remnants, in Cabo Frio, Búzios, and Saquarema (6 family groups and one single individual), were rescued and translocated to the location of what would become (in 1998) the União Biological Reserve[25][109][122][53][101]). The reserve lies within the species' historic area of occurrence but had no resident golden lion tamarins at the time. The two primary goals of the translocation program were to rescue imminently threatened golden lion tamarins and to add genetic diversity to the more protected part of the population.[25][109]

The population at the União reserve has grown substantially since the initial translocations. The population had already grown to 120 by December 2000,[25] and to more than 220 in 30 family groups by 2006.[109] The most recent census, carried out in 2022-2023 estimated that there were 473 descendants of the original translocated golden lion tamarins.[5] This represented 10% of the total estimated 2022-2023 population of 4,869 in the species' primary area of occurrence in the non-coastal area of the São João and Macaé river basins (calculated from,[5] Supplementary Materials).

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Groves, C. P. (2005). Wilson, D. E.; Reeder, D. M. (eds.). Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 133. ISBN 0-801-88221-4. OCLC 62265494.
  2. ^ Rylands AB, Mittermeier RA (2009). "The Diversity of the New World Primates (Platyrrhini)". In Garber PA, Estrada A, Bicca-Marques JC, Heymann EW, Strier KB (eds.). South American Primates: Comparative Perspectives in the Study of Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation. Springer. pp. 23–54. ISBN 978-0-387-78704-6.
  3. ^ a b c d Ruiz-Miranda, C.R.; Pissinatti, A.; Kierulff, M.C.M.; Oliveira, L.C.; Mittermeier, R.A.; Valença-Montenegro, M.M.; de Oliveira, P. & Jerusalinsky, L. (2021) [amended version of 2019 assessment]. "Leontopithecus rosalia". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2021 e.T11506A192327291. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2021-1.RLTS.T11506A192327291.en. Retrieved 18 February 2021.
  4. ^ "Appendices | CITES". cites.org. Retrieved 14 January 2022.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h Dietz, J.M.; Mickelberg, J.; Traylor-Holzer, K.; Martins, A.F.; Souza, M.N.; Hankerson, S.J. (2024). "Golden lion tamarin metapopulation dynamics five years after heavy losses to yellow fever". American Journal of Primatology. 86 (7) e23635. doi:10.1002/ajp.23635. PMID 38738522.
  6. ^ a b c d Rylands, AB; Kierulff, MCM; de Souza Pinto, LP (2002). "Distribution and status of lion tamarins". In Kleiman DG; Rylands AB (eds.). Lion tamarins: biology and conservation. Washington DC: Smithsonian Inst Pr. pp. 42–70.
  7. ^ a b c Burity, C. H. de Freitas; da Cruz, L.D.; Rocha, V.L.; da Conceição, N.B.; da Luz, D.E.; da Silva Santos, D.; da Costa Campos, D.; Pissinatti, A. (2007). "Golden lion tamarins, Leontopithecus rosalia (Linnaeus, 1766) in the Taquara Municipal Natural Park (Duque de Caxias, RJ): a southern extension of known range". Neotropical Primates. 14 (1): 30–31. doi:10.1896/044.014.0107.
  8. ^ a b c d Rubião, E.C.N.; Pissinatti, A.; Lourenço, M. Jr; Cattaneo, C.A.M.; Romijn, P.C.; Oliveira, J.D.V.; Borré, L.B.; Santos, D.A.; Mendonça, A.C.; Nascimento, J.L.; Oliveira., L.C. (2022). Registros do mico-leão-dourado (Leontopithecus rosalia) na Região Metropolitana do Estado do Rio de Janeiro [Records of the golden lion tamarin (Leontopithecus rosalia) in the metropolitan region of Rio de Janeiro State]. XIXth Congresso Brasileiro de Primatologia: Encontro Diversidades. Sinop, Matto Grosso.
  9. ^ Rowe N. (1996). The pictorial guide to the living primates. East Hampton (NY): Pogonias Pr.
  10. ^ Slifka, K.A.; Bowen, P.E.; Stacewicz-Sapuntzakis, M; Crissey, SD (1999). "A survey of serum and dietary carotenoids in captive wild animals". Journal of Nutrition. 129 (2): 380–390. doi:10.1093/jn/129.2.380. PMID 10024616.
  11. ^ Garber, P. A. (1980). "Locomotor behavior and feeding ecology of the panamanian tamarin (Saguinus oedipus geoffroyi, Callitrichidae, Primates)". International Journal of Primatology. 1 (2): 185–201. doi:10.1007/BF02735597. S2CID 26012530.
  12. ^ a b Rosenberger, A.L.; Stafford, B.J. (1994). "Locomotion in captive Leontopithecus and Callimico: a multimedia study". American Journal of Physical Anthropology 94(3): 379-394. 94 (3): 379–394.
  13. ^ a b Stafford, B.J.; Rosenberger, A.L.; Beck, B.B. (1994). "Locomotion of free-ranging golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia) at the National Zoological Park". Zoo Biology. 13: 333–344.
  14. ^ Serra, C. (2019). Uma Conservação Historia: A Mata Atlântica e o Mico-Leão-Dourado [A Conservation History: The Atlantic Forest and the Golden Lion Tamarin] (in Portuguese). Rio de Janeiro: Andrea Jakobsson Estúdio Editorial.
  15. ^ Marques, M.C.M.; Trindade, W.; Bohn, A.; Grelle, C.E.V. (2021). "The Atlantic Forest: An introduction to the megadiverse forest of South America". In Marques, M.C.M.; Grelle, C.E.V. (eds.). The Atlantic Forest: History, Biodiversity, Threats and Opportunities. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 3–23.
  16. ^ Kierulff, M.C.M (2000) Ecology and behaviour of translocated groups of golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia). PhD thesis, University of Cambridge. pp 41
  17. ^ Cerqueira, R.; Marroig, G.; Pinder, L. (1998). "Marmosets and lion-tamarins distribution (Callitrichidae, Primates) in Rio de Janeiro State, south-eastern Brazil". Mammalia. 62 (2): 213–226. doi:10.1515/mamm.1998.62.2.213.
  18. ^ Coimbra-Filho, A.F. (1969). "Mico-Leão, Leontideus rosalia (Linnaeus, 1766), situação atual da espécie no Brasil (Callitrichidae - Primates)" [Lion tamarin, Leontideus rosalia (Linnaeus, 1766), current situation of the species in Brazil (Callitrichidae - Primates)]. Annais da Academia Brasileira de Ciência (in Portuguese). 42 (supplement): 29–52.
  19. ^ a b c d e f Kierulff, M.C.M.; Rylands, A.B. (2003). "Census and distribution of the golden lion tamarin (Leontopithecus rosalia)". American Journal of Primatology. 59 (1): 29–44. doi:10.1002/ajp.10064. PMID 12526037.
  20. ^ Nascimento, J. L.; Eckhardt, B. L.; Antunes, E. P.; Andrade, F. P. S.; Cronemberger, C.; Soares, R.; Souza, N. F.; Souza, C. S. F.; Ribeiro, E. A.; Pereira, J.; Mattos, E.; Silva, V. M.; Stump, L.; Rubião, E. C. N.; Dias, P. R.; Gomes, M. M.; Silva, C. A. M.; Moreira, S. B.; Pissinatti, A.; Oliveira, L. C. (2019). Novos registros, ampliação da distribuição altitudinal e conservação de Leontopithecus rosalia (Linnaeus, 1766) no oeste do Mosaico Central Fluminense [New records, expansion of altitudinal distribution and conservation of Leontopithecus rosalia (Linnaeus, 1766) in the west of the Central Fluminense Mosaic]. Abstract from the 2019 Brazilian Primatological Conference (in Portuguese).
  21. ^ a b c Coimbra-Filho, A.F.; Mittermeier, R.A. (1973). "Distribution and ecology of the genus Leontopithecus Lesson, 1840 in Brazil". Primates. 14 (1): 47–66. doi:10.1007/BF01730515.
  22. ^ a b c d Magnanini, A. (1978). "Progress in the development of Poço das Antas Biological Reserve for Leontopithecus rosalia rosalia in Brazil". In Kleiman, D.G. (ed.). The Biology and Conservation of the Callitrichidae. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp. 131–136.
  23. ^ a b c Kierulff, M.C.M.; Procópio de Oliveira, P. (1994). "Re-assessing the status and conservation of the golden lion tamarin Leontopithecus rosalia in the wild". Dodo, Journal of the Wildlife Preservation Trust. 32: 98–115.
  24. ^ a b c d e f g Beck, B.B.; Castro, M.I.; Stoinski, T.S.; Ballou, J.D. (2002). "The effects of prerelease environments and postrelease management on survivorship in reintroduced golden lion tamarins". In Kleiman, D.G.; Rylands, A.B. (eds.). Lion Tamarins: Biology and Conservation. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp. 283–300.
  25. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Kierulff, M.C.M.; Procópio de Oliveira, P.; Beck, B.B.; Martins, A. (2002). "Reintroduction and translocation as conservation tools for golden lion tamarins". In Kleiman, D.G.; Rylands, A.B. (eds.). Lion Tamarins: Biology and Conservation. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp. 272–282.
  26. ^ a b c d e Dietz, J.; Menegassi, D.; Aroeira, A. (2022). "2021 Annual Report of the Associação Mico-Leão-Dourado" (PDF).
  27. ^ a b c d e Menegassi, D.; Ferraz, L.P. (2023). "Annual Report of the Associação Mico-Leão-Dourado, 2022" (PDF).
  28. ^ a b Padua, S.M.; Dietz, L.A.; Rambaldi, D.M.; de Souza, M.G.; dos Santos, G.R. (2002). "In situ conservation education and the lion tamarins". In Kleiman, D.G.; Rylands, A.B. (eds.). Lion Tamarins: Biology and Conservation. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp. 315–335.
  29. ^ a b c d Matsuo, P.M.; Rambaldi, D.M.; da Silva Bento, M.I.; Fernandes, R.V.; Boucinha, V. (2008). "Educação ambiental e políticas públicas para a conservação dos micos-leões-dourados". In Procópio de Oliveira, P.; Grativol, A.D.; Ruiz Miranda, C.R. (eds.). Conservação do Mico-Leão-Dourado [Conservation of the Golden Lion Tamarin] (in Portuguese). Campos dos Goytacazes: Associação Mico-Leão-Dourado & Editora da Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro. pp. 180–195.
  30. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Kierulff MCM; Raboy BE; de Oliveira PP; Miller K; Passos FC; Prado F. (2002). "Behavioral ecology of lion tamarins". In Kleiman DG; Rylands AB (eds.). Lion tamarins: biology and conservation. Washington DC: Smithsonian Inst Pr.
  31. ^ a b c d e f g h i Dietz JM; Peres CA; Pinder L. (1997). "Foraging ecology and use of space in wild golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia)". Am J Primatol. 41 (4): 289–305. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1997)41:4<289::AID-AJP2>3.0.CO;2-T. PMID 9093693.
  32. ^ a b c d e f g h Miller, K.E.; Dietz, J.M. (2006). "Effects of individual and group characteristics on feeding behaviors in wild Leontopithecus rosalia". International Journal of Primatology. 27 (3): 911–939. doi:10.1007/s10764-006-9046-z.
  33. ^ a b c d e f g h i Procópio de Oliveira, P.; Kierulff, M.C.M.; Lapenta, M.J. (2008). "Dieta e área de uso de micos-leões-dourados na Reserva Biológica União, RJ" [Diet and area of use of golden lion tamarins in the União Biological Reserve, RJ]. In Procópio de Oliveira, P.; Grativol, A.D.; Ruiz Miranda, C.R. (eds.). Conservação do Mico-Leão-Dourado [Conservation of the Golden Lion Tamarin] (in Portuguese). Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brazil: Associação Mico Leão-Dourado & Editora da Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro. pp. 40–57.
  34. ^ Lapenta, M.J.; Procópio de Oliveira, P. (2008). "Some aspects of seed dispersal effectiveness of golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia) in a Brazilian Atlantic forest". Tropical Conservation Science. 1 (2): 122–139. doi:10.1177/194008290800100205.
  35. ^ Lapenta, M.J.; Procópio de Oliveira, P.; Kierulff, M.C.M.; Motta-Junior, J.C. (2008). "Frugivory and seed dispersal of golden lion tamarin (Leontopithecus rosalia (Linnaeus, 1766)) in a forest fragment in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil". Brazilian Journal of Biology. 68 (2): 241–249. doi:10.1590/S1519-69842008000200004. PMID 18660951.
  36. ^ Peres, C. (1989). "Exudate-eating by wild golden lion tamarins, Leontopithecus rosalia". Biotropica. 21 (3): 287–288. Bibcode:1989Biotr..21..287P. doi:10.2307/2388660. JSTOR 2388660.
  37. ^ Napier, J.R.; Napier, P.H. (1967). A Handbook of Living Primates. New York: Academic Press.
  38. ^ Coimbra-Filho, A.F.; Mittermeier (1978). "Tree-gouging, exudate-eating and the "short-tusked" condition in Callithrix and Cebuella". In Kleiman, D.G. (ed.). The Biology and Conservation of the Callitrichidae. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp. 105–115.
  39. ^ Sussman, R.W.; Kinzey, W.G. (1984). "The ecological role of the Callitrichidae: a review". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 64 (4): 419–449. Bibcode:1984AJPA...64..419S. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330640407. PMID 6435456.
  40. ^ Smith, A.C. (2010). "Influences on gum feeding in primates". In Burrows, A.M.; Nash, L.T. (eds.). The Evolution of Exudativory in Primates. New York: Springer-Verlag. pp. 109–121.
  41. ^ a b Rosenberger, A. (2020). New World Monkeys; The Evolutionary Odyssey. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  42. ^ Procópio de Oliveira, P.; Nascimento, M.T.; Carvalho, F.A.; Vilela, D.; Kierulff, M.C.M.; Veruli, P.V.; Lapenta, M.J.; da Silva, A.P. (2008). "Qualidade do habitat na área de ocorrência do mico-leão-dourado" [Quality of the habitat in the area of occurrence of the golden lion tamarin]. In Procópio de Oliveira, P.; Grativol, A.D.; Ruiz Miranda, C.R. (eds.). Conservação do Mico-Leão-Dourado [Conservation of the Golden Lion Tamarin] (in Portuguese). Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brazil: Associação Mico-Leão-Dourado & Editora da Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro. pp. 14–39.
  43. ^ King, B.J. (1986). "Extractive foraging and the evolution of primate intelligence". Human Evolution. 1 (4): 361–372. doi:10.1007/BF02436709.
  44. ^ Bronikowski, E. J., Beck, B. B., and Power, M.L.. (1989) Innovation, exhibition and conservation: Free-ranging tamarins at the National Zoological Park. Proceedings of the 1989 American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums Conference: 540-546
  45. ^ Stoinski, T.S.; Beck, B.B.; Bloomsmith, M.A.; Maple, T.L. (2003). "A behavioral comparison of captive-born, reintroduced golden lion tamarins and their wild-born offspring". Behaviour. 140 (2): 137–160. doi:10.1163/156853903321671479.
  46. ^ a b c d e f g Peres, C.A. (1989). "Costs and benefits of territorial defense in wild golden lion tamarins, Leontopithecus rosalia". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 25 (3): 227–233. Bibcode:1989BEcoS..25..227P. doi:10.1007/BF00302922.
  47. ^ Bicca-Marques, J.C. (1999). "Hand specialization, sympatry, and mixed-species associations in callitrichines". Journal of Human Evolution. 36 (4): 349–378. Bibcode:1999JHumE..36..349B. doi:10.1006/jhev.1998.0272. PMID 10208791.
  48. ^ a b c d e f g Hankerson, S. J. (2008) Resource and space use in the wild golden lion tamarin, Leontopithecus rosalia. PhD thesis, University of Maryland. http://hdl.handle.net/1903/8812
  49. ^ Hankerson, S.J.; Dietz, J.M. (2014). "Predation rate and future reproductive potential explain home range size in golden lion tamarins". Animal Behaviour. 96: 87–95. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.07.026.
  50. ^ a b c d e f Lapenta, M.J.; Procópio de Oliveira, P.; Nogueira-Neto, P. (2007). "Daily activity period, home range and sleeping sites of golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia) translocated to the União Biological Reserve, RJ-Brazil". Mammalia. 71 (3): 131–137. doi:10.1515/MAMM.2007.027.
  51. ^ a b c d e f g Hankerson, S.J.; Franklin, S.P.; Dietz, J.M. (2007). "Tree and forest characteristics influence sleeping site choice by golden lion tamarins". American Journal of Primatology. 69 (9): 976–988. doi:10.1002/ajp.20400. PMID 17358010.
  52. ^ a b Coimbra-Filho, A.F. (1978). "Natural shelters of Leontopithecus rosalia and some ecological implications (Callitrichidae: Primates)". In Kleiman, D.G. (ed.). The Biology and Conservation of the Callitrichidae. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp. 79–89.
  53. ^ a b c d e f Kierulff, M.C.M (2000) Ecology and behaviour of translocated groups of golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia). PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
  54. ^ Heymann, E.W. (1995). "Sleeping habits of tamarins, Saguinus mystax and Saguinus fuscicollis (Mammalia, Primates, Callitrichidae), in north-eastern Peru". Journal of Zoology. 237 (2): 211–226. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1995.tb02759.x.
  55. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Franklin, S.P.; Hankerson, S.J.; Baker, A.J.; Dietz, J.M. (2007). "Golden lion tamarin sleeping site use and pre-retirement behavior during intense predation". American Journal of Primatology. 69 (3): 325–335. doi:10.1002/ajp.20340. PMID 17154389.
  56. ^ a b Beck, B.B.; Kleiman, D.G.; Dietz, J.M.; Castro, M.I.; Carvalho, C.; Martins, A.; Rettberg-Beck, B. (1991). "Losses and reproduction in reintroduced golden lion tamarins Leontopithecus rosalia". Dodo, Journal of the Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust. 27: 50–61.
  57. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Ruiz-Miranda CR; Kleiman DG (2002). "Conspicuousness and complexity: themes in lion tamarin communication". In Kleiman DG; Rylands AB (eds.). Lion tamarins: biology and conservation. Washington DC: Smithsonian Inst Pr. pp. 233–254.
  58. ^ Stafford, B.J.; Murad Ferreira, F. (1995). "Predation attempts on callitrichids in the Atlantic coastal rain forest of Brazil". Folia Primatologica. 65 (4): 229–233. doi:10.1159/000156894.
  59. ^ Coimbra-Filho, A.F. (1978). "Natural shelters of Leontopithecus rosalia and some ecological implications". In Kleiman, D.G. (ed.). The Biology and Conservation of the Callitrichidae. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp. 79–89.
  60. ^ Hankerson, S.J.; Franklin, S.P.; Dietz, J.M. (2007). "Tree and forest characteristics influence sleeping site choice by golden lion tamarins". American Journal of Primatology. 69 (9): 976–988. doi:10.1002/ajp.20400. PMID 17358010.
  61. ^ a b c d Kleiman, D.G.; Beck, B.B.; Dietz, J.M.; Dietz, L.A.; Ballou, J.D.; Coimbra Filho, A.F. (1986). "Conservation program for the golden lion tamarin: captive research and management, ecological studies, educational strategies, and reintroduction". In Benirschke, K. (ed.). Primates: The Road to Self-Sustaining Populations. New York: Springer-Verlag. pp. 959–979. ISBN 978-1-4612-4918-4.
  62. ^ McLanahan, E.B.; Green, K.M. (1978). "The vocal repertoire and an analysis of the contexts of vocalizations in Leontopithecus rosalia". In Kleiman, D.G. (ed.). The Biology and Conservation of the Callitrichidae. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp. 251–269.
  63. ^ a b Castro, M. I. (1990) A comparative study of anti-predator behavior in three species of lion tamarins (Leontopithecus) in captivity. M.Sc. thesis, University of Maryland, College Park
  64. ^ a b Dietz JM; Baker AJ (1993). "Polygyny and female reproductive success in golden lion tamarins, Leontopithecus rosalia". Anim Behav. 46 (6): 1067–1078. doi:10.1006/anbe.1993.1297.
  65. ^ a b Bales KL (2000). Mammalian monogamy: dominance, hormones, and maternal care in wild golden lion tamarins (PhD thesis). University of Maryland.
  66. ^ Baker AJ; Dietz JM (1996). "Immigration in wild groups of golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia)". Am J Primatol. 38 (1): 47–56. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1996)38:1<47::AID-AJP5>3.0.CO;2-T. PMID 31914716.
  67. ^ Baker AJ; Bales K; Dietz JM (2002). "Mating system and group dynamics in lion tamarins". In Kleiman DG; Rylands AB (eds.). Lion tamarins: biology and conservation. Washington DC: Smithsonian Inst Pr. pp. 188–212.
  68. ^ a b c d e f Boinski, S.; Moraes, E.; Kleiman, D.G.; Dietz, J.M.; Baker, A.J. (1994). "Intra-group vocal behaviour in wild golden lion tamarins, Leontopithecus rosalia: honest communication of individual activity". Behaviour. 130 (1–2): 53–75.
  69. ^ a b McLanahan, E.B.; Green, K.M. (1978). "The vocal repertoire and an analysis of the contexts of vocalizations in Leontopithecus rosalia". In Kleiman, D.G. (ed.). The Biology and Conservation of the Callitrichidae. Washington, D. C.: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp. 251–269.
  70. ^ a b c d Kleiman DG; Hoage RJ; Green KM (1988). "The lion tamarins, Genus Leontopithecus". In Mittermeier RA; Coimbra-Filho AF; da Fonseca GAB (eds.). Ecology and behavior of neotropical primates, Volume 2. Washington DC: World Wildlife Fund. pp. 299–347.
  71. ^ Benz, J.J.; French, J.A.; Leger, D.W. (1990). "Sex differences in vocal structure in a callitrichid primate, Leontopithecus rosalia". American Journal of Primatology. 21 (4): 257–264.
  72. ^ Halloy, M.; Kleiman, D.G. (1994). "Acoustic structure of long calls in free‐ranging groups of golden lion tamarins, Leontopithecus rosalia". American Journal of Primatology. 32 (4): 303–310.
  73. ^ Ruiz‐Miranda, C.R.; Kleiman, D.G.; Dietz, J.M.; Moraes, E.; Grativol, A.D.; Baker, A.J.; Beck, B.B. (1999). "Food transfers in wild and reintroduced golden lion tamarins, Leontopithecus rosalia". American Journal of Primatology. 48 (4): 305–320.
  74. ^ a b Epple, G.; Belcher, A.M.; Küderling, I.; Zeller, U.; Scolnick, L.; Greenfield, K.L.; Smith III, A.B. (1993). "Making sense out of scents: species differences in scent glands, scent-marking behaviour, and scent-mark composition in the Callitrichidae". In Rylands, A.B. (ed.). Marmosets and Tamarins: Systematics, Behaviour, and Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 123–151.
  75. ^ Smith, T. (2006). "Individual olfactory signatures in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus)". American Journal of Primatology. 68 (6): 585–604.
  76. ^ Mack, D.S.; Kleiman, D.G. (1978). "Distribution of scent marks in different contexts in captive lion tamarins Leontopithecus rosalia (Primates)". In Rothe, H.; Wolters, H.-J.; Hearn, J.P. (eds.). Biology and Behaviour of Marmosets. Göttingen, West Germany: Eigenverlag Hartmut Rothe. pp. 181–188.
  77. ^ Miller, K.E.; Laszlo, K.; Dietz, J.M. (2003). "The role of scent marking in the social communication of wild golden lion tamarins, Leontopithecus rosalia". Animal Behaviour. 65 (4): 795–803.
  78. ^ Franklin, S.P.; Miller, K.E.; Baker, A.J.; Dietz, J.M. (2007). "Do cavity‐nesting primates reduce scent marking before retirement to avoid attracting predators to sleeping sites?". American Journal of Primatology. 69 (3): 255–266.
  79. ^ Heymann, E.W. (2000). "Spatial patterns of scent marking in wild moustached tamarins, Saguinus mystax: no evidence for a territorial function". Animal Behaviour. 60 (6): 723–730.
  80. ^ Gosling, L.M.; Roberts, S.C. (2001). "Testing ideas about the function of scent marks in territories from spatial patterns". Animal Behaviour. 62 (3): F7 – F10.
  81. ^ Lledo-Ferrer, Y.; Peláez, F.; Heymann, E.W. (2011). "The equivocal relationship between territoriality and scent marking in wild saddleback tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis)". International Journal of Primatology. 32 (4): 974–991.
  82. ^ Lledo-Ferrer, Y.; Peláez, F.; Heymann, E.W. (2012). "Territorial polemics: a response to Roberts". International Journal of Primatology. 33 (4): 762–768.
  83. ^ Roberts, S.C. (2012). "On the relationship between scent-marking and territoriality in callitrichid primates". International Journal of Primatology. 33 (4): 749–761.
  84. ^ Snowdon, C.T.; Ziegler, T.E. (2021). "Contextual complexity of chemical signals in callitrichids". American Journal of Primatology. 83 (6): e23172.
  85. ^ a b c d Rathbun, C.D. (1979). "Description and analysis of the arch display in the golden lion tamarin, Leontopithecus rosalia rosalia". Folia Primatologica. 32 (1–2): 125–148.
  86. ^ Kleiman, D.G. (1978). "The development of pair preferences in Leontopithecus rosalia". In Rothe, H.-J. Wolters, and J.P. Hearn (eds.) Biology and Behaviour of Marmosets, pp. 203-207., H.; Wolters, H.-J.; Hearn, J.P. (eds.). Biology and Behaviour of Marmosets. Göttingen, West Germany: Eigenverlag Hartmut Rothe. pp. 203–207.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: editors list (link)
  87. ^ Hoage, R. J. (1982) Social and physical maturation in captive golden lion tamarins, Leontopithecus rosalia rosalia. Smithsonian Contributions to Primatology. No. 354
  88. ^ French, J.A.; Inglett, B.J. (1989). "Female-female aggression and male indifference in response to unfamiliar intruders in lion tamarins". Animal Behaviour. 37: 487–497.
  89. ^ Inglett, B.J.; French, J.A.; Simmons, L.G.; Vires, K.W. (1989). "Dynamics of intrafamily aggression and social reintegration in lion tamarins". Zoo Biology. 8 (1): 67–78.
  90. ^ Oliveira, C.R.; Ruiz‐Miranda, C.R.; Kleiman, D.G.; Beck, B.B. (2003). "Play behavior in juvenile golden lion tamarins (Callitrichidae: Primates): organization in relation to costs". Ethology. 109 (7): 593–612.
  91. ^ a b French JA; de Vleeschouwer K; Bales K; Hiestermann M (2002). "Lion tamarin reproductive biology". In Kleiman DG; Rylands AB (eds.). Lion tamarins: biology and conservation. Washington DC: Smithsonian Inst Pr.
  92. ^ French JA; Bales KL; Baker AJ; Dietz JM. (2003). "Endocrine monitoring of wild dominant and subordinate female Leontopithecus rosalia". Int J Primatol. 24 (6): 1281–1300. doi:10.1023/B:IJOP.0000005993.44897.ae.
  93. ^ Massicot, Paul (6 February 2005). "Animal Info - Golden Lion Tamarin". Archived from the original on 3 April 2006. Retrieved 5 November 2025.
  94. ^ Tardif SD; Santos CV; Baker AJ; Van Elsacker L; Feistner ATC; Kleiman DG; Ruiz-Miranda CR; Moura AC de A; Passos FC; Price EC; et al. (2002). "Infant care in lion tamarins". In Kleiman DG; Rylands AB (eds.). Lion tamarins: biology and conservation. Washington DC: Smithsonian Inst Pr. pp. 213–232.
  95. ^ a b Ruiz-Miranda, C.R.; de Morais Jr., M.M.; Dietz, L.A.; Rocha Alexandre, B.R.; Martins, A.F.; Ferraz, L.P.; Mickelberg, J.; Hankerson, S.J.; Dietz, J.M. (2019). "Estimating population sizes to evaluate progress in conservation of endangered golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia)". PLOS ONE. 14 (6) e0216664. Bibcode:2019PLoSO..1416664R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216664. PMC 6550383. PMID 31166940.
  96. ^ Anon. (2024) Brazil beat. The Golden Gazette. (www.savetheliontamain.org), 9 February 2024, unpaginated.
  97. ^ a b Dietz, James M.; Hankerson, Sarah J.; Alexandre, Brenda Rocha; Henry, Malinda D.; Martins, Andréia F.; Ferraz, Luís Paulo; Ruiz-Miranda, Carlos R. (10 September 2019). "Yellow fever in Brazil threatens successful recovery of endangered golden lion tamarins". Scientific Reports. 9 (1): 12926. Bibcode:2019NatSR...912926D. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-49199-6. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 6736970. PMID 31506447.
  98. ^ Ruiz-Miranda, C.R.; Affonso, A.G.; Martins, A.; Beck, B. (2000). "Distribuição do sagüi (Callithrix jacchus) nas áreas de ocorrência do mico-leão-dourado (Leontopithecus rosalia) no estado do Rio de Janeiro" [Distribution of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) in the areas of occurrence of the golden lion tamarin (Leontopithecus rosalia) no estado do Rio de Janeiro 'Portuguese']. Neotropical Primates. 8 (3): 98–101. doi:10.62015/np.2000.v8.455.
  99. ^ Ruiz-Miranda, C.R.; Affonso, A.G.; de Morais, M.M.; Verona, C.E.; Martins, A.; Beck, B.B. (2006). "Behavioral and ecological interactions between reintroduced golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia Linnaeus, 1766) and introduced marmosets (Callithrix spp, Linnaeus, 1758) in Brazil's Atlantic Coast Forest fragments". Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. 49 (1): 99–109. doi:10.1590/S1516-89132006000100012.
  100. ^ de Morais Jr., M.M.; Ruiz-Miranda, C.R.; Grativol, A.D.; de Andrade, C.C.; Lima, C.S.; Martins, A.; Beck, B.B. (2008). "Os sagüis, Callithrix jacchus e penicillata, como espécies invasoras na região de ocorrência do mico-leão dourado" [The marmosets, Callithrix jacchus and penicillata, as invasive species in the region of occurrence of the golden lion tamarin]. In Procópio de Oliveira, P.; Grativol, A.D.; Ruiz Miranda, C.R. (eds.). Conservação do Mico-Leão-Dourado [Conservation of the Golden Lion Tamarin] (in Portuguese). Campos dos Goytacazes: Associação Mico-Leão-Dourado & Editora da Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro. pp. 86–117.
  101. ^ a b c d Beck, B.B. (2018). Unwitting Travelers: A History of Primate Reintroduction. Berlin, MD: Salt Water Media. ISBN 978-1-62806-208-3.
  102. ^ Kierulff, C. (2015). "Golden-headed lion tamarin invaders in Niterói". Tamarin Tales. 13: 1–3.
  103. ^ Meyer, A.S.; Pie, M.R.; Passos, F. (2014). "Assessing the exposure of lion tamarins (Leontopithecus spp.) to future climate change". American Journal of Primatology. 76 (6): 551–562. doi:10.1002/ajp.22247. PMID 24346860.
  104. ^ Mallinson, J. (1984). "Lion tamarins' survival hangs in balance". Oryx. 18 (2): 72–78. doi:10.1017/S0030605300018731.
  105. ^ a b Pessamilio, D.M. (2016). O Mico-leão-dourado e a Mata Atlântica [The Golden Lion Tamarin and the Atlantic Forest 'Portuguese']. Rio de Janeiro: Self-published.
  106. ^ Green, K. M. (1980) An Assessment of the Poco D'Anta [sic] Reserve, Brazil, and Prospects for the Survival of the Golden Lion Tamarin, Leontopithecus rosalia rosalia. Unpublished report.
  107. ^ Kleiman, D.G. (1983). "The behavior and conservation of the golden lion tamarin, Leontopithecus r. Rosalia". In Thiago de Mello, M. (ed.). A Primatologia no Brasil ['Portuguese' Primatology in Brazil] (1st ed.). Brasília: Sociedade Brasileira de Primatologia. pp. 35–53.
  108. ^ Dietz, L.A.; Nagagata, E. (1985). "Projeto Mico Leão. V. Programa de educação communitária para conservação do mico-leão-dourado - Leontopithecus rosalia (Linnaeus 1766). Desenvolvimento e avaliação de educação como uma tecnologia para a conservação de uma espécie em extinção" [Golden Lion Tamarin Project. V. Community education program for conservation of the golden lion tamarin - Leontopithecus rosalia (Linnaeus 1766). Development and evaluation of education as a technique for conservation of an endangered species]. In de Mello, M.T. (ed.). A Primatologia no Brasil [Primatology in Brazil 2] (in Portuguese) (2 ed.). Brasília: Sociedade Brasileira de Primatologia. pp. 249–256.
  109. ^ a b c d e Procópio de Oliveira, P.; Kierulff, M.C.M.; Lapenta, M.J.; Martins, A.F.; Beck, B. (2008). "Técnicas de manejo para conservação do mico-leão-dourado" [Management techniques for conservation of the golden lion tamarin]. In Procópio de Oliveira, P.; Grativol, A.D.; Ruiz Miranda, C.R. (eds.). Conservação do Mico-Leão-Dourado [Conservation of the Golden Lion Tamarin] (in Portuguese). Campos dos Goytacazes: Associação Mico-Leão-Dourado & Editora da Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro.
  110. ^ Fernandes, R.V.; Rambaldi, D.M.; de Godoy Teixeira, A.M. (2008). "Restauração e proteção legal da paisagem – corredores florestais e RPPNs" [Restoration and legal protection of landscape - forest corridors and private reserves]. In Procópio de Oliveira, P.; Grativol, A.D.; Ruiz Miranda, C.R. (eds.). Conservação do Mico-Leão-Dourado [Conservation of the Golden Lion Tamarin] (in Portuguese). Campos dos Goytacazes: Associação Mico-Leão-Dourado & Editora da Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro. pp. 160–179.
  111. ^ Anon. (2016) A success story of forest restoration: Fazenda Dourada corridor – NEWS – Save the Golden Lion Tamarin, 10 June 2016. www.savetheliontamarin.org.
  112. ^ Anon. (2018) União – Expanding protection for GLTs – NEWS – Save the Golden Lion Tamarin, 30 January 2018. www.savetheliontamarin.org.
  113. ^ Anon. (2018) Land purchase gives GLTs a chance to survive – NEWS – Save the Golden Lion Tamarin, 20 April 2018. www.savetheliontamarin.org.
  114. ^ a b Menegassi, D.; Ferraz, L.P.; Mureb, L. (2025). "Annual Report of the Associação Mico-Leão-Dourado, 2024" (PDF).
  115. ^ a b Possas, C.; Lourenço-de-Oliveira, R.; Tauil, P.L.; de Paula Pinheiro, F.; Pissinatti, A.; da Cunha, R.V.; Freire, M.; Martins, R.M.; Homma, A. (2018). "Yellow fever outbreak in Brazil: the puzzle of rapid viral spread and challenges for immunization". Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 113 (10) e180278. doi:10.1590/0074-02760180278. PMC 6135548. PMID 30427974.
  116. ^ de Miranda, R.M.; Fernandes, R.S.; da Silva-Fernandes, A.T.; Ferreira-de-Brito, A.; Moreira, S.B.; Pereira, R.; da Silva Mendes, Y.; de Lima, S.M.B.; Pissinatti, A.; da Silva Freire, M.; Alencar, J.A.F.; Lourenço-de-Oliveira, R. (2022). "Neotropical sylvatic mosquitoes and Aedes aegypti are not competent to transmit 17DD attenuated yellow fever virus from vaccinated viremic New World non-human primates". Viruses. 14 (10): 2231. doi:10.3390/v14102231. PMC 9611963. PMID 36298786.
  117. ^ a b Secco, H.; Gessulli, R.D.; Dias, M.M.; Machado, T. de Oliveira; Guerreiro, M. (2022). "Golden lion tamarins use artificial canopy overpass to get around: a new road for their conservation?". Biodiversity. 23 (3–4): 156–158. Bibcode:2022Biodi..23..156S. doi:10.1080/14888386.2022.2140709.
  118. ^ Ascensão, F.; Niebuhr, B.B.; Moraes, A.M.; Alexandre, B.R.; Assis, J.C.; Alves-Eigenheer, M.A.; Ribeiro, J.W.; de Morais Jr., M.M.; Martins, A. F.; de Oliveira, A.; Moraes, E.; Ramos, J.H.; Lorini, M.L.; Ferraz, L.P.; Culot, L.; Dietz, J.M.; Ruiz-Miranda, C.R.; Ribeiro, M.C. (2019). "End of the line for the golden lion tamarin? A single road threatens 30 years of conservation efforts". Conservation and Science Practice. 1 (9): e59.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  119. ^ Beck, B.; Kleiman, D.; Dietz, J.; Castro, I.; Carvalho, C.; Martins, A.; Rettberg-Beck, B. (1991). "Losses and reproduction in reintroduced golden lion tamarins". Dodo, Journal of Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust. 27: 50–61.
  120. ^ Kleiman, D.G.; Beck, B.B.; Dietz, J.M.; Dietz, L.A. (1991). "Costs of a reintroduction and criteria for success: accounting and accountability in the Golden Lion Tamarin Conservation Program". In Gipps, J.H.W. (ed.). Beyond Captive Breeding. Reintroducing Endangered Species to the Wild. Oxford University Press. pp. 125–142.
  121. ^ Ackerman, D (1991). "A reporter at large. Golden monkeys". The New Yorker, 24 June 1991. pp. 36–54.
  122. ^ Kierulff, M.C.M.; de Oliveira, P.P. "Habitat preservation and the translocation of threatened groups of golden lion tamarins, Leontopithecus rosalia". Neotropical Primates. 2 (suppl): 15–18. doi:10.62015/np.1994.v2.235.
[edit]

About

No page comments added.

Links